Thursday, February 18, 2010

Missouri House Passes Autism Insurance Bill


JEFFERSON CITY, MO. (St. Louis Public Radio) - The Missouri House has passed legislation that would mandate insurance coverage for treatment of autism spectrum disorders.
Lawmakers had said that autism legislation would be a top priority this year. The bill would require insurance providers in Missouri to cover up to $36,000 a year for behavioral therapy for kids age 18 and younger with autism.
The Senate version differs. It would provide $55,000 of coverage per year for those with autism under age 21. State Senator Eric Schmitt (R, Glendale), whose 5-year-old son Stephen has autism, remains hopeful that a compromise can be reached.
"These therapies that we're talking about are the difference between a mom being able to take her daughter to a movie, a dad taking his son to a ball game, a child having meaningful relationships and friendships, being invited to a birthday party, a lot of things that we just take for granted," Schmitt said.
House leaders were roundly criticized in 2009 for not holding a vote on autism coverage. But House Speaker Ron Richard (R, Joplin) defended last year's inaction before reporters today at the Governor's Mansion.
"I mean, you all just kicked me in the butt every week on autism last year...I'm telling you, there wasn't a consensus! We made a consensus happen (this year) through (House Minority Floor Leader) Paul (LeVota) and I working through the process, and now it's a bill that we're proud of," Richard said.
St. Louis Public Radio also made calls to the Missouri Insurance Coalition for this story, but so far they have not commented. The group has said that mandating coverage for treatment of autism would harm small businesses.
Source:
© Copyright 2010, St. Louis Public Radio

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Both Parents’ Ages Linked to Autism Risk

Older mothers are more likely than younger ones to have a child with autism, and older fathers significantly contribute to the risk of the disorder when their partners are under 30, researchers are reporting.

In a study published online on Monday in the journal Autism Research, the researchers analyzed almost five million births in California during the 1990s, and 12,159 cases of autism diagnosed in those children — a sample large enough to examine how the risk of autism was affected when one parent was a specific age and the other was the same age or considerably older or younger.

Previous research found that the risk of autism grew with the age of the father. The new study suggested that when the father was over 40 and the mother under 30, the increased risk was especially pronounced — 59 percent greater than for younger men.
By contrast, for women 30 and older, the risk of autism rose 13 percent when the father was over 40.

Every five-year increase in a mother’s age raised her risk of having a child with autism by 18 percent; a 40-year-old woman’s risk was 50 percent greater than that of a woman who became a mother in her late 20s, and 77 percent higher than that of a woman under 25.
But while the number of California women giving birth in their 40s rose sharply in the 1990s, the researchers said that could not account for the sevenfold rise in autism during the decade.
“The rise in autism is occurring among children of parents of all ages,” said Janie F. Shelton, a graduate student in epidemiology at the University of California, Davis, who was the paper’s lead author. “We can’t say that the shifting trend of maternal age is responsible for the increased rates of autism.”

The new findings appeared to question the conclusions of earlier research suggesting that the risk of autism spectrum disorders increased with advancing paternal age, but not with advancing maternal age.

One such study analyzed a large Israeli military database and found that children of fathers 40 or older were more than five times as likely to have an autism disorder as those whose fathers were under 30.

An author of that study, Dr. Dolores Malaspina, a psychiatrist at New York University Langone Medical Center, said Monday that mothers and fathers were usually so close in age that small statistical differences could appear to shift the effect of advanced age from one parent to another.

“It’s important we not turn around and blame mothers,” Dr. Malaspina said. “The evidence is very, very strong that there is a paternal age effect.”